Today I have had the opportunity to
have a discussion with Yves Ilunga around the issue mining companies are facing
regarding the VAT reimbursement.
Yves Ilunga has been acting as CFO
for different mining companies in several countries in Africa including the DRC.
Hervé OTSCHUDI: Mr Ilunga, we all red Bloomberg
article last September saying that Congo Miners Claim $1.2 Billion of Unpaid
Tax Reimbursements. What is the
current situation? Better or worse?
Yves ILUNGA: I haven't had a look at the latest
figures, however, I do suspect that if Government does not exempt mining
companies from paying input VAT on imports or does not allow them to compensate
their VAT Credit against payable taxes such as payroll taxes, and income tax,
then the situation can only get worst. Based on the information received from various
key players within the industry, I suspect that the issue is still being
addressed on an ad-hoc basis ("A la tete du Client", as we say in French).
Hervé OTSCHUDI:
What prevents the government from reimbursing the VAT?
Yves ILUNGA: In my humble opinion, I do not
believe that Government had fully assessed the implications of implementing VAT
in 2011. 97 to 98% of our exports are comprised of mining products. We also
have a significant portion of our small industrial base that produces zero "VATed"
products such as cement and basic food stuffs.
Considering the importance of both
these segments in our economy, and the requirement to essentially
"reimburse" Input VAT incurred by companies operating in these
sectors of the economy, stricter treasury rules had to be implemented in the
management of Input VAT received from these entities.
What I practically mean in
accounting terms is that VAT received from these industries should have been
accounted for as payable and not as income by Government.
When you have an industry that is
VAT exempted either because its main source of revenue is derived from exports,
which are zero rated, or because its main source of revenue is generated from
zero-rated products, you should essentially assume that all VAT received
through expenditures incurred by these companies will be reimbursable at some
stage in the future.
Hervé OTSCHUDI: Is the VAT system, as it is applied, adequate
for the DRC economy?
Yves ILUNGA: I don't believe that we should be
solely speaking about the structure of our economy. Many countries around the
World have a positive balance of payment (I.e. exports are higher than imports)
and similar VAT Rules to the DRC, where exports are exempted from output VAT.
However, what these countries are doing right is that they carefully manage
income from VAT payments, in order to ensure that they have sufficient funds
available for reimbursement.
It also needs to be noted here that
late reimbursement of VAT by Government in certain jurisdictions will result in
interests’ payment by Government. That's not the case in the DRC! VAT is not
only reimbursed (when this actually happens) without interests, but is
reimbursed in Congolese Francs. Implying that businesses have lost out on
financial income that could have been generated with these funds, and have been
subject to forex loses resulting from the weakening of the Congolese Francs.
Hervé OTSCHUDI: I can only imagine the size of
those foreign exchange loses based on CDF depreciation observed the last two
years. The worst part is that the VAT reimbursement is still pending while the
local currency is yet to be stabilized.
What could be the alternative for
the government?
Yves ILUNGA: I'm a firm believer that the DRC
did not have the maturity required to implement VAT... and the results are
showing! I am of the opinion that we should have retained the "ICA"
(Impot sur le Chiffre d'Affaires) system.
The "ICA" was a special
sales tax payable by the Client, and was not reimbursable. It allowed government to better plan for
fiscal income and did not come with all the headache related to managing VAT.
However, considering that we have
already implemented VAT, I am of the opinion that we need to cure the cancer
first, and then improve our overall health. What I mean is that we need to
ensure that Government meets its commitments and reimburses the VAT currently
due. As mentioned above, this could be in the form of tax credits on future tax
payments or by simply suspending the payment of VAT on imports by mining
companies and other affected industries. I insist that the suspension of VAT
must be on imports only, as suspending VAT on local purchases will only
transfer the problem to subcontractors and other local entities providing goods
and services to exempted industries, like mining.
I understand that this might have negative
implications on government revenues in the future, however, "The Law is
The Law" and no one should be above it, including government.
As funds are being returned to their
rightful owners, government should then implement a VAT treasury management plan
that will ensure that reimbursements take place at the right time and that
funds received form the payment of VAT are not recorded or used as Income.
Hervé OTSCHUDI: What is the direct impact for
mining companies?
Yves ILUNGA: The Impact on mining companies has
been potential loss of financial revenues, forex losses, and more importantly
the inability to meet working capital requirements, necessary for conducting
business. I would also like to highlight that for those companies with excess
cash, it implies a reduction of potential dividends that could have been paid
to shareholders, and in the case of mining companies that would include Government.
Hervé OTSCHUDI: Mr. Ilunga, thank you very much
for your time…
